Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

In vitro investigation of head and neck cancer stem cell proportions and their changes following X-ray irradiation as a function of HPV status.

Paul Reid, Puthenparampil Wilson, Yanrui Li, Loredana G Marcu, Alexander H Staudacher, Michael P Brown, Eva Bezak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cannot Target What Cannot Be Seen: Molecular Imaging of Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul ReidSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-878X
Puthenparampil WilsonSchool of Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Yanrui LiSansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Loredana G MarcuSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Alexander H StaudacherTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, and University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Michael P BrownTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, and University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Eva BezakSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of Oradea · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSome head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have a distinct aetiology, which depends on the presence of oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV). Also, HNSCC contains cancer stem cells (CSCs) that have greater radioresistance and capacity to change replication dynamics in response to irradiation compared to non-clonogenic cells. Since there is limited data on CSCs in HNSCC as a function of HPV status, better understanding of their radiobiology may enable improved treatment outcome.

methodsBaseline and post-irradiation changes in CSC proportions were investigated by flow cytometry in a HPV-negative (UM-SCC-1) and a HPV-positive (UM-SCC-47) HNSCC cell line, using fluorescent staining with CD44/ALDH markers. CSC proportions in both irradiated and unirradiated cultures were compared for the two cell lines at various times post-irradiation. To assess repopulation of CSCs, untreated cultures were depleted of CD44+/ALDH+ cells and re-cultured for 3 weeks before flow cytometry analysis.

resultsCSC proportions in untreated cell lines were 0.57% (UM-SCC-1) and 2.87% (UM-SCC-47). Untreated cell lines depleted of CD44+/ALDH+ repopulated this phenotype to a mean of 0.15% (UM-SCC-1) and 6.76% (UM-SCC-47). All UM-SCC-47 generations showed elevated CSC proportions after irradiation, with the most significant increase at 2 days post-irradiation. The highest elevation in UM-SCC-1 CSCs was observed at 1 day post-irradiation in the 2nd generation and at 3 days after irradiation in the 3rd generation. When measured after 10 days, only the 3rd generation of UM-SCC-1 showed elevated CSCs.

conclusionsCSC proportions in both cell lines were elevated after exposure and varied with time post irradiation. UM-SCC-47 displayed significant plasticity in repopulating the CSC phenotype in depleted cultures, which was not seen in UM-SCC-1.

Indexed as

Aldehyde DehydrogenaseCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsNeoplastic Stem CellsPapillomaviridaeSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTime FactorsX-RaysAldehyde DehydrogenaseHyaluronan Receptors

Identifiers

PMID29028842
PMCPMC5640219
OpenAlexW2762382554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.