Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028814›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Diversity and microevolution of CRISPR loci in Helicobacter cinaedi.

Junko Tomida, Yuji Morita, Keigo Shibayama, Ken Kikuchi, Tomohiro Sawa, Takaaki Akaike, Yoshiaki Kawamura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microbial genomics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Occurrence and Diversity of CRISPR Loci inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. The ecology and evolution of microbial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Junko TomidaDepartment of Microbiology, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8518-1493
Yuji MoritaDepartment of Microbiology, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.
Keigo ShibayamaDepartment of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken KikuchiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro SawaDepartment of Microbiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takaaki AkaikeDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences and Molecular Toxicology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshiaki KawamuraDepartment of Microbiology, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.
Aichi Gakuin University · JPKumamoto University · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter cinaedi is associated with nosocomial infections. The CRISPR-Cas system provides adaptive immunity against foreign genetic elements. We investigated the CRISPR-Cas system in H. cinaedi to assess the potential of the CRISPR-based microevolution of H. cinaedi strains. A genotyping method based on CRISPR spacer organization was carried out using 42 H. cinaedi strains. The results of sequence analysis showed that the H. cinaedi strains used in this study had two CRISPR loci (CRISPR1 and CRISPR2). The lengths of the consensus direct repeat sequences in CRISPR1 and CRISPR2 were both 36 bp-long, and 224 spacers were found in the 42 H. cinaedi strains. Analysis of the organization and sequence similarity of the spacers of the H. cinaedi strains showed that CRISPR arrays could be divided into 7 different genotypes. Each genotype had a different ancestral spacer, and spacer acquisition/deletion events occurred while isolates were spreading. Spacer polymorphisms of conserved arrays across the strains were instrumental for differentiating closely-related strains collected from the same hospital. MLST had little variability, while the CRISPR sequences showed remarkable diversity. Our data revealed the structural features of H. cinaedi CRISPR loci for the first time. CRISPR sequences constitute a valuable basis for genotyping, provide insights into the divergence and relatedness between closely-related strains, and reflect the microevolutionary process of H. cinaedi.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsGenetic LociGenomicsHelicobacterMultilocus Sequence Typing

Identifiers

PMID29028814
PMCPMC5640232
OpenAlexW2763017756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.