Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028668›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2018

The mycobiome in HIV.

Christopher L Hager, Mahmoud A Ghannoum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Salivary mycobiome alterations in HIV-infected MSM: dominance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Functional biomes beyond the bacteriome in the oral ecosystem.The Japanese dental science review · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher L HagerCenter for Medical Mycology, Case Western Reserve University, and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mahmoud A Ghannoum

Funding

Effects of IL-6 blockade in treated HIV infectionU01AI105937 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LEDERMAN, MICHAEL MARCEL, RODRIGUEZ, BENIGNO · 2013 to 2017
$5.8M
Mechanism of antifungal action of Pichia proteinsR01DE024228 · NIDCR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GHANNOUM, MAHMOUD A · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI105937NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThere are a limited number of studies investigating the association between the microbiome and HIV. Although the majority of these published investigations have focused on the role of the bacterial community (bacteriome) in this setting, a handful of studies have also characterized the role of the mycobiome in HIV-infected individuals. This review will summarize the most recent reports pertaining to the role of the fungal community in HIV. RECENT

findingsDifferences in the composition of the oral and respiratory mycobiome in HIV-infected individuals compared with uninfected individuals have been reported. SUMMARY: Our review shows that studies investigating the role of the mycobiome in the setting of HIV are severely lacking. With recent advances in our understanding of the composition of the human microbiome, investigations into the role of the bacteria and fungus comprising the overall microbiota and how the two interact to influence each other and the host is crucial.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycobiomeHIV InfectionsHumansMouthRespiratory System

Identifiers

PMID29028668
PMCPMC5805152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.