Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29028220›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2018

Pediatric brain repair from endogenous neural stem cells of the subventricular zone.

Yusuke Niimi, Steven W Levison

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Stem Cell Therapy in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yusuke NiimiLaboratory for Regenerative Neurobiology, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Steven W LevisonLaboratory for Regenerative Neurobiology, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is great interest in the regenerative potential of the neural stem cells and progenitors that populate the germinal zones of the immature brain. Studies using animal models of pediatric brain injuries have provided a clearer understanding of the responses of these progenitors to injury. In this review, we have compared and contrasted the responses of the endogenous neural stem cells and progenitors of the subventricular zone in animal models of neonatal cerebral hypoxia-ischemia, neonatal stroke, congenital cardiac disease, and pediatric traumatic brain injury. We have reviewed the dynamic shifts that occur within this germinal zone with injury as well as changes in known signaling molecules that affect these progenitors. Importantly, we have summarized data on the extent to which cell replacement occurs in response to each of these injuries, opportunities available, and obstacles that will need to be overcome to improve neurological outcomes in survivors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrainBrain DiseasesBrain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticCell DifferentiationCerebral VentriclesHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainInfant, NewbornLateral VentriclesMiceNeural Stem CellsNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29028220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.