Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027975›Full record

ArticleNutrients2017

Dietary Supplement Use during Preconception: The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

Elle McKenna, Alexis Hure, Anthony Perkins, Ellie Gresham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the diets of mothers and their partners during pregnancy: Findings from the Queensland Family Cohort pilot study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Preconception Care in a Remote Aboriginal Community Context: What, When and by Whom?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elle McKennaGriffith Health, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia. elle.mckenna@griffithuni.edu.au.
Alexis HureSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. alexis.hure@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2225-0986
Anthony PerkinsGriffith Health, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia. a.perkins@griffith.edu.au.
Ellie GreshamGriffith Health, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia. ellie.gresham@health.nsw.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, dietary supplement use among reproductive aged women is becoming increasingly common. The aim of this study was to investigate dietary supplement use among Australian women during preconception. Self-reported data were collected prospectively for the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH). The sample included 485 women aged 31-36 years, with supplement data, classified as preconception when completing Survey 5 of the ALSWH in 2009. Frequency and contingency tables were calculated and Pearson's chi-square test for associations between demographic variables and supplementation status was performed. Sixty-three per cent of women were taking at least one dietary supplement during preconception. Multiple-micronutrient supplements were the most commonly reported supplement (44%). Supplements containing folic acid and iodine were reported by 51% and 37% of preconception women, respectively. Folic acid (13%), omega-3 fatty acids (11%), vitamin C (7%), B vitamins (4%), iron (3%), and calcium (3%) were the most common single nutrients supplemented during preconception. Women trying to conceive, with no previous children, and born outside Australia were more likely to take dietary supplements. In Australia, dietary supplement use during preconception is relatively high. However, supplementation of recommended nutrients, including folic acid and iodine, could be improved.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPreconception CareReproductionReproductive HealthWomen's HealthAdultAustraliaChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesSelf ReportTime Factorsdietary supplementsmaternalmultivitaminspreconception

Identifiers

PMID29027975
PMCPMC5691735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.