Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027903›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Functional dichotomy in spinal- vs prefrontal-projecting locus coeruleus modules splits descending noradrenergic analgesia from ascending aversion and anxiety in rats.

Stefan Hirschberg, Yong Li, Andrew Randall, Eric J Kremer, Anthony E Pickering

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 268 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Central Somatic Transmission Mediates Proprioceptive Facilitation of Muscle Pain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan HirschbergSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Yong LiSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Andrew RandallSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Eric J KremerIGMM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Anthony E PickeringSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-0456
University of Bristol · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust GR088373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The locus coeruleus (LC) projects throughout the brain and spinal cord and is the major source of central noradrenaline. It remains unclear whether the LC acts functionally as a single global effector or as discrete modules. Specifically, while spinal-projections from LC neurons can exert analgesic actions, it is not known whether they can act independently of ascending LC projections. Using viral vectors taken up at axon terminals, we expressed chemogenetic actuators selectively in LC neurons with spinal (

Indexed as

AnxietyNociceptive PainAnimalsLocus CoeruleusModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRatsSpinal Cordattentionchemogeneticsendogenous analgesialocus coeruleusneurosciencenoradrenalinepainrat

Identifiers

PMID29027903
PMCPMC5653237
OpenAlexW2763252886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.