Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027641›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2018

Cost Effectiveness of Imatinib, Dasatinib, and Nilotinib as First-Line Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in China.

Na Li, Bin Zheng, Hong-Fu Cai, Jing Yang, Xiao-Feng Luo, Li-Zhu Weng, Feng-Mei Zhan, Mao-Bai Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Bin ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Hong-Fu CaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Xiao-Feng LuoDepartment of Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Li-Zhu WengSchool of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Feng-Mei ZhanSchool of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Mao-Bai LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China. liumaobai@163.com.
Fujian Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission 2014-ZQN-JC-15Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission 2015-CX-R4Fujian Provincial Planning Office of Social Sciences 2014C042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have obvious effects on chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but they are expensive in China. Moreover, the overall cost of treatment of CML is high and the medical economic burden of patients with CML on the government is heavy. This study tested the cost effectiveness of imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib as first-line treatment in Chinese patients who were first diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP).

methodsA state-transition Markov model combining clinical effectiveness, utility, and cost data was used. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness of the model outcomes.

resultsThe imatinib-first, dasatinib-first, and nilotinib-first strategy offered patients 9.76, 9.87, and 9.72 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of US$303,502.42, US$381,681.03, and US$305,509.92 over 20 years, respectively. The nilotinib-first strategy exhibited the lowest utility and highest price and was thus eliminated. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the imatinib-first strategy and the dasatinib-first strategy showed that the dasatinib-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICER) of 710,714.64 $/QALY compared with the imatinib-first strategy, which exceeded the threshold; hence, the dasatinib-first strategy was not cost effective and was eliminated. The results were robust for multiple sensitivity analyses.

conclusionFrom the perspective of the Chinese medical system, imatinib is likely to be more cost effective than dasatinib and nilotinib for patients who were first diagnosed with CML-CP.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisDasatinibDisease ProgressionHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsDasatinibImatinib MesylatenilotinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID29027641
OpenAlexW2763919110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.