Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027639›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.

J Jayakumaran, K Wiercinski, C Buffington, A Caceres

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J JayakumaranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 70 West Gore Street, Orlando, FL, 34743, USA. drjphari@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-1882
K WiercinskiFlorida Hospital Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA.
C BuffingtonFlorida Hospital Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA.
A CaceresDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, 70 West Gore Street, Orlando, FL, 34743, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The da Vinci Xi surgical system was released with several upgrades and modifications compared to the previous robotic generations to facilitate minimal invasive surgery. Herein, we present our preliminary experience of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site gynecologic surgery performed for benign indications with the da Vinci Xi robotic system in a single center. Thirty-five female patients underwent robotic single-site surgery between June 2016 and January 2017. The median console time for hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy was 41 min. The median intracorporeal vaginal cuff closure time was 18 min. Two cases (5.7%) were converted to robotic-assisted multiport surgery. There was one major intraoperative complication (2.9%). None of the patient required blood transfusion. When comparing our first 12 cases to subsequent 12 cases of R-LESS hysterectomy, there was a statistically significant decrease in surgical times and estimated blood loss. On logistic regression analysis, no association was detected between BMI and port entry time (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83-1.04, p = 0.23), console time (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.02, p = 0.37), cuff closure time (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.76-1.09, p = 0.33), operative time (OR 1, 95% CI 0.98-1.01, p = 0.97), and estimated blood loss (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, p = 0.33). Our preliminary experience with robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using the da Vinci Xi system has demonstrated feasibility and safety in select patients. Further studies with greater number of patients in multiple settings will help us to fully elucidate the role of da Vinci Xi surgical system in single-site gynecologic surgery.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresVaginaYoung Adultda Vinci Xi surgical systemRobotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgeryRobotic surgerySingle-port surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.