ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized robotic assisted surgery system in hysterectomy: a prospective, investigational device exemption clinical trial.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Trial
- Clinical application and early experience of da Vinci Xi robotic single-site laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in mainland China: early experience from a retrospective consecutive cohort of 221 cases.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery by da Vinci Xi system in gynecology: a retrospective series of 721 cases.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Comparing Two Types of Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy Using Propensity Score Matching: Coaxial with da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci SP System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynecology: single-center experience with 106 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Article
- Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The da Vinci Xi surgical system was released with several upgrades and modifications compared to the previous robotic generations to facilitate minimal invasive surgery. Herein, we present our preliminary experience of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site gynecologic surgery performed for benign indications with the da Vinci Xi robotic system in a single center. Thirty-five female patients underwent robotic single-site surgery between June 2016 and January 2017. The median console time for hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy was 41 min. The median intracorporeal vaginal cuff closure time was 18 min. Two cases (5.7%) were converted to robotic-assisted multiport surgery. There was one major intraoperative complication (2.9%). None of the patient required blood transfusion. When comparing our first 12 cases to subsequent 12 cases of R-LESS hysterectomy, there was a statistically significant decrease in surgical times and estimated blood loss. On logistic regression analysis, no association was detected between BMI and port entry time (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83-1.04, p = 0.23), console time (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.02, p = 0.37), cuff closure time (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.76-1.09, p = 0.33), operative time (OR 1, 95% CI 0.98-1.01, p = 0.97), and estimated blood loss (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, p = 0.33). Our preliminary experience with robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using the da Vinci Xi system has demonstrated feasibility and safety in select patients. Further studies with greater number of patients in multiple settings will help us to fully elucidate the role of da Vinci Xi surgical system in single-site gynecologic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29027639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.