Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027628›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2017

The Prognostic Significance of Measurable ("Minimal") Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Francesco Buccisano, Christopher S Hourigan, Roland B Walter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing Immune Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco BuccisanoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. francesco.buccisano@uniroma2.it.
Christopher S HouriganMyeloid Malignancies Section, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Roland B WalterClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Detection, prevention and treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse.ZIAHL006163 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI HOURIGAN, CHRISTOPHER · 2013 to 2023
$21.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review was to evaluate recent literature on detection methodologies for, and prognostic significance of, measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RECENT

findingsThere is no "one-fits-all" approach to MRD testing in AML. Most exploited to date are methods relying on immunophenotypic aberrancies (identified via multiparameter flow cytometry) or genetic abnormalities (identified via PCR-based assays). Current methods have important shortcomings, including the lack of assay platform standardization/harmonization across laboratories. In parallel to refinements of existing technologies and data analysis/interpretation, new methodologies (e.g., next-generation sequencing-based assays) are emerging that eventually may complement or replace existing ones. This dynamic evolution of MRD testing has complicated comparisons between individual studies. Nonetheless, an ever-growing body of data demonstrates that a positive MRD test at various time points throughout chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation identifies patients at particularly high risks of disease recurrence and short survival even after adjustment for other risk factors.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisSurvival RateAcute myeloid leukemiaFlow cytometryMinimal residual diseaseNext-generation sequencingPolymerase chain reactionPrognostication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.