ArticleSkeletal radiology2018
Dose reduction for fluoroscopically guided injections: phantom simulation and patient procedures.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image Quality and Dose Comparison of 3 Mobile Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems in Spine Surgery.World neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Pearls and pitfalls of fluoroscopic-guided foot and ankle injections: what the radiologist needs to know.Skeletal radiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo demonstrate fluoroscopy dose reduction through both simulated injections on a phantom and patient injections. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. Simulation on a phantom was used to estimate effective dose, entrance dose, and organ doses for hip joint injections without and with dose minimization technique (DMT). Additionally, 1,094 joint, bursae, and tendon sheath injections performed by three operators in the same fluoroscopy suite were evaluated both before and after application of DMT. Fluoroscopy time (FT), dose, and dose area product (DAP) of injections were compared using unpaired t-tests with P > 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsFor the phantom simulation comparing injections without DMT and with DMT, the total DAP was 191.7 vs 18.7 μGy·m
conclusionsFT, effective dose, entrance dose, and DAP can be reduced with the use of simple easy-to-learn techniques, which will benefit both the patient and the radiologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29027573What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.