Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027511›Full record

Trial reportTrends in hearing

Evaluation of a Frequency-Lowering Algorithm for Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss.

Marina Salorio-Corbetto, Thomas Baer, Brian C J Moore

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04145661 (A Comparison of Conventional Hearing Aid Processing), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04145661 nacompletednot on this map

A Comparison of Conventional Hearing Aid Processing (CP) and Non-linear Frequency Compression (NLFC) Processing in Adult Patients With and Without Cochlear Dead Regions Who Have a Moderate to Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

TypeinterventionalSponsorManchester University NHS Foundation TrustRan2019 to 2020Enrolled11ConditionsSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Cochlear Hearing LossArmsHearing aids programmed conventionally., Hearing aids programmed with compression activated.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frequency-lowering processing to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in patients with age-related hearing loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina Salorio-Corbetto1 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-5284
Thomas Baer1 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Brian C J Moore1 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G8717539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to determine the effects of a frequency-lowering algorithm (frequency composition, Fcomp) on consonant identification, word-final /s, z/ detection, the intelligibility of sentences in noise, and subjective benefit, for people with high-frequency hearing loss, including people with dead regions (DRs) in the cochlea. A single-blind randomized crossover design was used. Performance with Bernafon Acriva 9 hearing aids was compared with Fcomp off and Fcomp on. Participants wore the hearing aids in each condition in a counterbalanced order. Data were collected after at least 8 weeks of experience with a condition. Outcome measures were audibility, scores from the speech perception tests, and scores from a questionnaire comparing self-perceived hearing ability with Fcomp off and Fcomp on. Ten adults with mild to severe high-frequency hearing loss (seven with extensive DRs, one with patchy or restricted DRs, and two with no DR) were tested. Fcomp improved the audibility of high-frequency sounds for 6 out of 10 participants. There was no overall effect of Fcomp on consonant identification, but the pattern of consonant confusions varied across conditions and participants. For word-final /s, z/ detection, performance was significantly better with Fcomp on than with Fcomp off. Questionnaire scores showed no differences between conditions. In summary, Fcomp improved word-final /s, z/ detection. No benefit was found for the other measures.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHearing AidsSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentHearing Loss, High-FrequencyHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSingle-Blind Methoddead regionsfrequency loweringfrequency transpositionhearing aids

Identifiers

PMID29027511
PMCPMC5642012
OpenAlexW2764076457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.