Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027313›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018

Patient experiences with care across various types of mental health care: Questionnaire development, measurement invariance, and patients' reports.

Luk Bruyneel, Sabine Van Houdt, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Walter Sermeus, Else Tambuyzer, Peter Cosemans, Gert Peeters, Kris Van den Broeck, Ilse Weeghmans, Kris Vanhaecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New Instrument to Measure Hospital Patient Experiences in Flanders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luk BruyneelLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-692X
Sabine Van HoudtFlemish Patient Platform, Heverlee, Belgium.
Ellen CoeckelberghsLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Walter SermeusLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Else TambuyzerFlemish Patient Platform, Heverlee, Belgium.
Peter CosemansZorgnet Icuro, Brussels, Belgium.
Gert PeetersUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kris Van den BroeckFlemish Association for Psychiatry, Kortenberg, Belgium.
Ilse WeeghmansFlemish Patient Platform, Heverlee, Belgium.
Kris VanhaechtLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To describe the development, validation, and findings of a patient experience questionnaire across 7 types of residential and ambulatory mental health care services. Thirty-five items were hypothesized to cover information, participation, therapeutic relationship, personalized care, organization and collaboration, safety, patient rights, outcomes of care, and discharge preparation and after-care. Also included were 2 overall rating items (scoring and recommending the organization). This Dutch questionnaire was applied in 79 organizations in Belgium (N patients = 5,168). Exploratory structural equation modelling was conducted on a random split-half sample to examine dimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis and multiple group confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on the holdout sample to confirm dimensionality and assess measurement invariance across type of service and patient characteristics. Multilevel logistic regression models linking subscale top box scores to overall rating items were used to assess criterion validity. The hypothesized dimensionality was partly confirmed, and configural and scalar invariance were demonstrated across types of organizations and patient characteristics. Subscale scores were significantly associated with overall ratings. Process evaluation showed that participating organizations strongly support continued use of this questionnaire. This validated patient experience questionnaire supports comparison across organizations from different types of services to improve the quality of mental health care.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultadolescent psychiatrybiostatisticshealth servicepsychometricsscale validation

Identifiers

PMID29027313
PMCPMC6877140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.