Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027297›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2018

Factors associated with ambulatory care sensitive emergency department visits for South Carolina Medicaid members with intellectual disability.

S McDermott, J Royer, J R Mann, B S Armour

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Consultation Model for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S McDermottDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
J RoyerRevenue and Fiscal Affairs Office, Columbia, SC, USA.
J R MannDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
B S ArmourNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USHer Majesty's Revenue and Customs · GBUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmbulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) can be seen as failure of access or management in primary care settings. Identifying factors associated with ACSCs for individuals with an Intellectual Disability (ID) provide insight into potential interventions.

methodTo assess the association between emergency department (ED) ACSC visits and a number of demographic and health characteristics of South Carolina Medicaid members with ID. A retrospective cohort of adults with ID was followed from 2001 to 2011. Using ICD-9-CM codes, four ID subgroups, totalling 14 650 members, were studied.

resultsThere were 106 919 ED visits, with 21 214 visits (19.8%) classified as ACSC. Of those, 82.9% were treated and released from EDs with costs averaging $578 per visit. People with mild and unspecified ID averaged greater than one ED visit per member year. Those with Down syndrome and other genetic cause ID had the lowest rates of ED visits but the highest percentage of ACSC ED visits that resulted in inpatient hospitalisation (26.6% vs. an average of 16.8% for other subgroups). When compared with other residential types, those residing at home with no health support services had the highest ED visit rate and were most likely to be discharged back to the community following an ED visit (85.2%). Adults residing in a nursing home had lower rates of ED visits but were most likely to be admitted to the hospital (38.9%) following an ED visit. Epilepsy and convulsions were the leading cause (29.6%) of ACSC ED visits across all subgroups and residential settings.

conclusionPrevention of ACSC ED visits may be possible by targeting adults with ID who live at home without health support services.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory CareComorbidityEmergency Service, HospitalEpilepsyFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedNursing HomesRetrospective StudiesSeizuresambulatory care sensitive conditionsemergency department visitshospitalisationsID

Identifiers

PMID29027297
PMCPMC5803329
OpenAlexW2764129597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.