Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027198›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2017

Shape analysis of spatial relationships between orbito-ocular and endocranial structures in modern humans and fossil hominids.

Ana Sofia Pereira-Pedro, Michael Masters, Emiliano Bruner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain structure and function in Homo naledi.Brain structure & function · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reconstructing cranial evolution in an extinct hominin.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Language, Paleoneurology, and the Fronto-Parietal System.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Sofia Pereira-PedroCentro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana, Burgos, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-255X
Michael MastersMontana Tech, Butte, MT, USA.
Emiliano BrunerCentro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana, Burgos, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4616
Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana · ESMontana Technological University · US

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The orbits and eyes of modern humans are situated directly below the frontal lobes and anterior to the temporal lobes. Contiguity between these orbital and cerebral elements could generate spatial constraints, and potentially lead to deformation of the eye and reduced visual acuity during development. In this shape analysis we evaluate whether and to what extent covariation exists between ocular morphology and the size and spatial position of the frontal and temporal areas in adult modern humans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to investigate patterns of variation among the brain and eyes, while computed tomography (CT) was used to compare cranial morphology in this anatomical region among modern humans, extinct hominids and chimpanzees. Seventeen landmarks and semi-landmarks that capture the outline of the eye, frontal lobe, anterior fossa/orbital roof and the position of the temporal tips were sampled using lateral scout views in two dimensions, after projection of the average grayscale values of each hemisphere, with midsagittal and parasagittal elements overlapped onto the same plane. MRI results demonstrated that eye position in adult humans varies most with regard to its horizontal distance from the temporal lobes and, secondly, in its vertical distance from the frontal lobes. Size was mainly found to covary with the distance between the eye and temporal lobes. Proximity to these cerebral lobes may generate spatial constraints, as some ocular deformation was observed. Considering the CT analysis, modern humans vary most with regard to the orientation of the orbits, while interspecific variation is mainly associated with separation between the orbits and endocranial elements. These findings suggest that size and position of the frontal and temporal lobes can affect eye and orbit morphology, though potential effects on eye shape require further study. In particular, possible effects of these spatial and allometric relationships on the eye and vision should be examined using ontogenetic samples, vision parameters such as refractive error in diopters, and three-dimensional approaches that include measures of extraocular soft tissues within the orbit.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEyeFemaleFossilsFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrbitSkullTemporal LobeYoung Adulteyeballfrontal lobesfunctional craniologygeometric morphometricsorbitstemporal lobes

Identifiers

PMID29027198
PMCPMC5696126
OpenAlexW2763023211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.