Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027151›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018

Comparison of Different Ion Mobility Setups Using Poly (Ethylene Oxide) PEO Polymers: Drift Tube, TIMS, and T-Wave.

Jean R N Haler, Philippe Massonnet, Fabien Chirot, Christopher Kune, Clothilde Comby-Zerbino, Jan Jordens, Maarten Honing, Ynze Mengerink, Johann Far, Philippe Dugourd and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence of Cis/Trans-Isomerization at Pro7/Pro16 in the Lasso Peptide Microcin J25.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jean R N HalerMass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, Allée du Six Aout 11, B-4000, Liège, Belgium. jean.haler@ulg.ac.be.
Philippe MassonnetMass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, Allée du Six Aout 11, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.
Fabien ChirotInstitut des Sciences Analytiques, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon1, Ens de Lyon, CNRS, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
Christopher KuneMass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, Allée du Six Aout 11, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.
Clothilde Comby-ZerbinoInstitut Lumière Matière, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
Jan JordensDSM Resolve, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Maarten HoningDSM Resolve, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Ynze MengerinkDSM Resolve, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Johann FarMass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, Allée du Six Aout 11, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.
Philippe DugourdInstitut Lumière Matière, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
Edwin De PauwMass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, Allée du Six Aout 11, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, polymer analyses using ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) measurements have been performed on different ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) setups. In order to be able to compare literature data taken on different IM(-MS) instruments, ion heating and ion temperature evaluations have already been explored. Nevertheless, extrapolations to other analytes are difficult and thus straightforward same-sample instrument comparisons seem to be the only reliable way to make sure that the different IM(-MS) setups do not greatly change the gas-phase behavior. We used a large range of degrees of polymerization (DP) of poly(ethylene oxide) PEO homopolymers to measure IMS drift times on three different IM-MS setups: a homemade drift tube (DT), a trapped (TIMS), and a traveling wave (T-Wave) IMS setup. The drift time evolutions were followed for increasing polymer DPs (masses) and charge states, and they are found to be comparable and reproducible on the three instruments. ᅟ.

Indexed as

Drift tubeIon mobilityMass spectrometryPoly (ethylene oxide)Synthetic polymersTIMSTraveling wave

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.