Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027128›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2018

Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Bolus of Beta-Lactams in Critically Ill Patients with Respiratory Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Young R Lee, Pamela D Miller, Saeed K Alzghari, Delilah D Blanco, Jackson D Hager, Kailey S Kuntz

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Young R LeeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA. young.lee@ttuhsc.edu.
Pamela D MillerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA.
Saeed K AlzghariGulfstream Genomics, LLC, 9301 N Central Expressway STE 335, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA.
Delilah D BlancoTampa General Hospital, 1 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
Jackson D HagerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA.
Kailey S KuntzDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USID Genomics (United States) · USTampa General Hospital · USTexas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients display altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and are more likely to be infected with more resistant pathogens. Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent pharmacodynamics; therefore, it is postulated that continuous infusion (CI) may optimize these parameters.

objectiveTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature comparing CI versus intermittent bolus (IB) of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adult patients with respiratory infections to determine if clinical benefits exist.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analyses of clinical cure and/or mortality. Four retrospective studies reporting clinical cure and/or mortality, and 11 studies that reported pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were included in the systematic review.

resultsThe majority of patients in both groups maintained the percentage of time the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) targets throughout the treatment, with differences favoring CI being more prevalent when the MIC of the offending pathogen increased. CI of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adult patients with respiratory infections significantly improved clinical cure rates when compared to IB (risk ratio [RR] 1.177; 95% CI 1.065-1.300). No significant differences in mortality rates were seen when patients were treated with either dosing modality (RR 0.845; 95% CI 0.644-1.108).

conclusionsCI of beta-lactam antibiotics is associated with better cure rates and higher %fT > MIC when administered to critically ill patients with respiratory infections, but may be most beneficial in severely ill patients with more resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCritical IllnessHumansInfusions, IntravenousMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID29027128
OpenAlexW2761596501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.