Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29027123›Full record

ArticleProtein & cell2018

Pluripotent stem cells secrete Activin A to improve their epiblast competency after injection into recipient embryos.

Jinzhu Xiang, Suying Cao, Liang Zhong, Hanning Wang, Yangli Pei, Qingqing Wei, Bingqiang Wen, Haiyuan Mu, Shaopeng Zhang, Liang Yue and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein & cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinzhu XiangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Suying CaoAnimal Science and Technology College, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, China.
Liang ZhongState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hanning WangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yangli PeiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qingqing WeiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bingqiang WenState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Haiyuan MuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shaopeng ZhangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Liang YueState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Genhua YueTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Bing LimStem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.
Jianyong HanState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. hanjy@cau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-3279
China Agricultural University · CNBeijing University of Agriculture · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNGenome Institute of Singapore · SGTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not fully clear why there is a higher contribution of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to the chimera produced by injection of PSCs into 4-cell or 8-cell stage embryos compared with blastocyst injection. Here, we show that not only embryonic stem cells (ESCs) but also induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can generate F0 nearly 100% donor cell-derived mice by 4-cell stage embryo injection, and the approach has a "dose effect". Through an analysis of the PSC-secreted proteins, Activin A was found to impede epiblast (EPI) lineage development while promoting trophectoderm (TE) differentiation, resulting in replacement of the EPI lineage of host embryos with PSCs. Interestingly, the injection of ESCs into blastocysts cultured with Activin A (cultured from 4-cell stage to early blastocyst at E3.5) could increase the contribution of ESCs to the chimera. The results indicated that PSCs secrete protein Activin A to improve their EPI competency after injection into recipient embryos through influencing the development of mouse early embryos. This result is useful for optimizing the chimera production system and for a deep understanding of PSCs effects on early embryo development.

Indexed as

ActivinsAnimalsCells, CulturedEmbryonic DevelopmentGerm LayersMicePluripotent Stem Cellsactivin AActivins4-cell embryo injectionActivin Achimeric micepluripotent stem cellssecreted proteins

Identifiers

PMID29027123
PMCPMC6053354
OpenAlexW2762009871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.