ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017
Cell response of flexible PMMA-derivatives: supremacy of surface chemistry over substrate stiffness.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present work reports on the development of a range of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene glycol) (PMMAPEG)-based materials, characterized by different elasticity moduli in order to study the influence of the substrate's mechanical properties on the response of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). To render the selected materials cell-interactive, a polydopamine (PDA)/gelatin type B (Gel B) coating was applied. Prior to the in vitro assay, the success of the PDA and Gel B immobilization onto the materials was confirmed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as reflected by the nitrogen percentages measured for the materials after PDA and Gel B deposition. Tensile tests showed that materials with E-moduli ranging from 37 to 1542 MPa could be obtained by varying the ratio between PMMA and PEG as well as the PEG molecular weight and its functionality (i.e. mono-methacrylate vs. di-methacrylate). The results after 1 day of cell contact suggested a preferred HUVECs cell growth onto more rigid materials. After 1 week, the material with the lowest E-modulus of 37 MPa showed lower cell densities compared to the other materials. No clear correlation could be observed between the number of focal adhesion points and the substrate stiffness. Although minor differences were found, these were not statistically significant. This last conclusion again highlights the universal character of the PDA/Gel B modification. The present work could thus be valuable for the development of a range of cell substrates requiring different mechanical properties in line with the envisaged application while the cell response should ideally remain unaffected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29027051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.