Observational studyLasers in medical science2018
Analysis of choroidal thickness in ocular hypertensive patients using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.
Observational study in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of retinal and choroidal microcirculation in Behçet's disease.Eye (London, England) · 2022Article
- Ocular blood flow and choroidal thickness in ocular hypertension.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of retinal and choroidal changes in patients with Alzheimer's type dementia using optical coherence tomography angiography.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Macular Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Ocular Hypertension as Assessed Using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography.Beyoglu eye journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare choroidal thickness between subjects with ocular hypertension (OHT) and normal individuals and explore factors affecting choroidal thickness. This study included 60 untreated newly diagnosed OHT eyes and 60 normal eyes. Choroidal thickness obtained from Cirrus HD-OCT was measured at different locations in the macular and peripapillary regions and compared between the two groups before and after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Regression analysis was performed to figure out factors influencing choroidal thickness. The macular choroidal thickness did not vary significantly between OHT patients and normal controls regardless of locations (all P > 0.05). The average peripapillary choroidal thickness was 167 ± 53 μm in OHT eyes and 185 ± 63 μm in the normal eyes; no significant differences were identified (P = 0.107). Only one of the locations in the temporal area in the OHT group demonstrated significantly thinner peripapillary choroidal thickness as compared to the normal group (P = 0.033). Age was the only significant factor affecting choroidal thickness on multivariate analysis regardless of locations (all P < 0.001). Choroidal thickness of the macular and peripapillary regions in OHT patients is not decreased significantly except one location in the temporal area of the optic disc when comparing with the normal subjects. Anatomic peripapillary choroidal thickness measurements with SD-OCT might be one more tool to track changes in OHT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29027026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.