Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29026997›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

A systematic review of integrative clinical trials for supportive care in pediatric oncology: a report from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology, T&CM collaborative.

Andrea L Radossi, Katherine Taromina, Stacey Marjerrison, Caroline J Diorio, Raquel Similio, Festus Njuguna, Glenn M Afungchwi, Elena J Ladas

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea L RadossiDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Katherine TarominaDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Stacey MarjerrisonDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Caroline J DiorioDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Raquel SimilioDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Festus NjugunaDepartment of Child Health and Pediatrics, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Glenn M AfungchwiBanso Baptist Hospital, PO Box 9, Nso Bui Division, Kumbo, Cameroon.
Elena J LadasDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, 3959 Broadway, CHN 10-06A, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ejd14@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

American Cancer Society 127000-MRSG-14-157-01-CCE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) use in children with cancer is well established among high-income, upper middle-income, low-middle-income, and low-income countries (HIC, UMIC, LMIC, LIC, respectively). In HIC, a developing body of evidence exists for several T&CM therapies; however, evidence in other income settings is less well described despite a significantly higher use when compared to reports from HIC. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for T&CM for a variety of supportive care indications among children with cancer.

methodsWe performed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines of randomized, controlled clinical trials from inception through September 2016. Our eligibility criteria were limited to T&CM studies performed in children and adolescents undergoing treatment for a pediatric malignancy.

resultsOf 6342 studies identified, 44 met inclusion criteria. Two clinical trials reported on acupuncture, 1 reported on aromatherapy, 9 evaluated massage therapy, and 32 reported on dietary supplements. Twenty-two studies were performed in HIC, 15 in UMIC, and 7 in LMIC. T&CM therapies were most commonly investigated for the prevention or management of mucositis, weight loss, and febrile neutropenia. Encouraging results were reported for select interventions; however, the majority of studies were classified as poor to fair quality.

conclusionOur search revealed numerous clinical studies investigating the use of T&CM for supportive care purposes in pediatric oncology in HIC, UMIC, and LMIC. Although limited, these results could inform supportive care resource allocation and indicate where T&CM may serve to fill gaps where access to care may be limited.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicMedical OncologyAdolescentAge FactorsAge of OnsetChildComplementary TherapiesHumansNeoplasmsPalliative CareSocieties, MedicalIntegrative medicinePediatric oncologySupportive careSymptom managementTraditional and complementary medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.