Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29026937›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017

[Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgical management of upper gastrointestinal cancer].

P P Grimminger, H F Fuchs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Robot-Assisted Oesophagectomy: Recommendations Towards a Standardised Ivor Lewis Procedure.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P P GrimmingerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
H F FuchsKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, Köln, Deutschland. hans.fuchs@uk-koeln.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELVR-Klinik Köln · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total minimally invasive upper gastrointestinal resections are currently mainly performed in centers. The advantages include reduction of operative trauma, magnified enlargement of the operation field and the resulting improvement in operative precision. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and laparoscopic/thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are currently the most commonly performed strategies for esophageal cancer. Laparoscopic (MIG) and robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) are the equivalent procedures for gastric cancer. Due to the relatively low number of reported cases, no definitive statement regarding superiority of these procedures compared to standard open or hybrid procedures can be made; however, there is mounting evidence from high-volume centers in which these procedures are routinely performed that there might be an advantage regarding perioperative morbidity. All of the four procedures described are provided at our high-volume centers in a standardized manner and we are convinced of the benefits of these minimally invasive techniques with respect to morbidity compared to open and hybrid techniques. The additional costs of this technology have to be off-set against a possible reduction of morbidity, reduced cost for personnel and new operative options, such as real-time fluoroscopy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresEsophagectomyHumansLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresEsophagectomyGastrectomyHybrid techniqueOpen surgical techniqueRobotics

Identifiers

PMID29026937
OpenAlexW2761174371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.