ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017
[Current treatment concepts in intracerebral hemorrhage].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraventricular Lavage vs External Ventricular Drainage for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Intracerebral haemorrhage: from clinical settings to animal models.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2020Review
- MicroRNA-146a protects against intracerebral hemorrhage by inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- Smartphone-assisted endoscopic surgery via Kocher's point for intraventricular hemorrhage caused by thalamic hemorrhage: A comparison with external ventricular drainage.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIn recent years, various important studies investigating the management of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have been published. However, these have not entered guideline recommendations yet. Therefore, essential results are summarized here and the findings are integrated into current treatment concepts. MATERIALS AND
methodsBased on a dedicated literature review and the authors' experience, up-to-date and high-quality investigations were identified. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Randomized data and meta-analyses provide evidence that aggressive blood-pressure reduction (targeting a systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg) appears safe and reduces hematoma enlargement. ICH associated with intake of vitamin K antagonists should be reversed immediately using prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and vitamin K, targeting at least international normalized ratio levels below 1.3. For dabigatran-related ICH, an antidote (idarucizumab) is available for reversal, but in ICH under the use of factor Xa inhibitors evidence is poor. However, reversal should be carried out using high-dosed PCC (50 IU/kg PCC). Routine hematoma evacuation surgery cannot be advocated, yet new minimally invasive strategies provide promising results. In patients with acute occlusive hydrocephalus, an external ventricular drain should be placed and utilizing intraventricular lysis appears safe, reduces mortality, and is associated with improved functional outcome. Adding lumbar drainage to this treatment strategy may reduce permanent shunt dependency. The sum of treatment measures and specialized care at high-volume centers improves outcome in patients with ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.