Methods for estimating medication adherence to antiretroviral therapy: Response to Mehta

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. mHealth Intervention to Improve Treatment Outcomes Among People With HIV Who Use Cocaine: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2022
   Article
2. A Comment on "Prevalence and Factors Associated with Depression among Clinically Stable People Living with HIV/AIDS on Antiretroviral Therapy".Indian journal of psychological medicine
   Article
3. HIV-Related Knowledge in PLHIV: Issues to Consider in the Indian Context-A Reply to Banagi Yathiraj et al.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
   Article
4. Improving the assessment of medication adherence: Challenges and considerations with a focus on low-resource settings.Tzu chi medical journal
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.