Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29026690›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of methodology2017

Pancreatic imaging: Current status of clinical practices and small animal studies.

Ting Yin, Yewei Liu, Ronald Peeters, Yuanbo Feng, Yicheng Ni

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ting YinDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yewei LiuDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ronald PeetersDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yuanbo FengDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yicheng NiDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different causative factors acting on the pancreas can result in diseases such as pancreatitis, diabetes and pancreatic tumors. The high incidence and mortality of pancreatic diseases have placed diagnostic imaging in a crucial position in daily clinical practice. In this mini-review article different pancreatic imaging techniques are discussed, from the standard clinical imaging modalities and state of the art clinical magnetic resonance imaging techniques to current situations in pre-clinical pancreatic imaging studies. In particular, the challenges of pre-clinical rodent pancreatic imaging are addressed, with both the image acquisition techniques and the post-processing methods for rodent pancreatic imaging elaborated.

Indexed as

3.0T scannerPancreatic imagingQuantitative magnetic resonance imagingRatsState of the art clinical magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29026690
PMCPMC5618143
OpenAlexW2757384420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.