ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2017
Directing the osteoblastic and chondrocytic differentiations of mesenchymal stem cells: matrix vs. induction media.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jiawei Yanghe Decoction Regulates Bone-Lipid Balance through the BMP-SMAD Signaling Pathway to Promote Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Surface engineering of titania nanotubes incorporated with double-layered extracellular vesicles to modulate inflammation and osteogenesis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- AnStem cells international · 2021Review
- Customizable Implant-specific and Tissue-Specific Extracellular Matrix Protein Coatings Fabricated Using Atmospheric Plasma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Construction and evaluation of fibrillar composite hydrogel of collagen/konjac glucomannan for potential biomedical applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While both induction culture media and matrix have been reported to regulate the stem cell fate, little is known about which factor plays a more decisive role in directing the MSC differentiation lineage as well as the underlying mechanisms. To this aim, we seeded MSCs on HA-collagen and HA-synthetic hydrogel matrixes, which had demonstrated highly different potentials toward osteoblastic and chondrocytic differentiation lineages, respectively, and cultured them with osteogenic, chondrogenic and normal culture media, respectively. A systematic comparison has been carried out on the effects of induction media and matrix on MSC adhesion, cytoskeleton organization, proliferation, and in particular differentiation into the osteoblastic and chondrocytic lineages. The results demonstrated that the matrix selection had a much more profound effect on directing the differentiation lineage than the induction media did. The strong modulation effect on the transcription activities might be the critical factor contributing to the above observations in our study, where canonical Wnt-β-Catenin signal pathway was directly involved in the matrix-driven osteoblastic differentiation. Such findings not only provide a critical insight on natural cellular events leading to the osteoblastic and chondrocytic differentiations, but also have important implications in biomaterial design for tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.