ArticlePlant methods2017
A plant-based chemical genomics screen for the identification of flowering inducers.
Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant Metabolites Screening Identifies 7-epi-10-Deacetyltaxol Inhibiting Cell Division by Interfering With the Cell Cycle and Microtubule Organization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- High-throughput screening for biostimulant discovery: opportunities to enhance nitrogen use efficiency.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- A high-throughput differential chemical genetic screen uncovers genotype-specific compounds altering plant growth.iScience · 2025Article
- Small chemical molecules regulating the phytohormone signalling alter the plant's physiological processes to improve stress adaptation, growth and productivity.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- Comparative genomics of flowering behavior inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A synthetic peptide encoded by a random DNA sequence inhibits discrete red light responses.Plant direct · 2019Article
- Flowering plants return to the sea….Journal of experimental botany · 2019Article
- Extensive nuclear reprogramming and endoreduplication in mature leaf during floral induction.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFloral timing is a carefully regulated process, in which the plant determines the optimal moment to switch from the vegetative to reproductive phase. While there are numerous genes known that control flowering time, little information is available on chemical compounds that are able to influence this process. We aimed to discover novel compounds that are able to induce flowering in the model plant Arabidopsis. For this purpose we developed a plant-based screening platform that can be used in a chemical genomics study.
resultsHere we describe the set-up of the screening platform and various issues and pitfalls that need to be addressed in order to perform a chemical genomics screening on Arabidopsis plantlets. We describe the choice for a molecular marker, in combination with a sensitive reporter that's active in plants and is sufficiently sensitive for detection. In this particular screen, the firefly Luciferase marker was used, fused to the regulatory sequences of the floral meristem identity gene
conclusionsIn this study a chemical genomics screening platform was developed to discover compounds that can induce flowering in Arabidopsis. This platform was used successfully, to identify a compound that can speed-up flowering in Arabidopsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.