Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29026383›Full record

SynthesisAfrican health sciences2017

Association between ALDH

Jiang Xinhua, Zhao Yanfei

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in African health sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Primary Reason for Drinking Among Current, Former, and Never Flushing College Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiang XinhuaZhejiang quhua hospital.
Zhao YanfeiClinical laboratory of Quzhou Women's hospital.
Guhua Hospital · CNQuzhou City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe findings from studies on the relationship between aldehyde dehydrogenases(ALDH) gene Glu504Lys polymorphism and colorectal cancer(CRC) were inconsistent.

objectivesThe aim of this meta-analysis was to assess ALDH gene Glu504Lys polymorphism and CRC risk.

methodsAll of the relevant studies were identified from PubMed and Embase database. Statistical analyses were conducted with STATA 12.0 software. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) values were applied to evaluate the strength of the association. Nine studies with 2779 cases and 4533 controls were included.

resultsNo significant variation in CRC risk was detected in any of the genetic models overall. To explore the sources of heterogeneity,we performed further sub-group analyses by ethnicity and quality assessment of these studies. In the sub-group analysis by race, significant associations between ALDH gene Glu504Lys polymorphism and CRC risk were found in China(Glu/Lys vs Glu/Glu: OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.57-0.85; the dominant model: OR =0.69, 95%CI =0.48-0.98) and Japan(Lys/Lys vs Glu/Glu:OR =0.72, 95%CI =0.55-0.95).

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that the ALDH2 Glu504Lys polymorphism may be associated with susceptibility to CRC. Furthermore, large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Indexed as

Aldehyde DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase, MitochondrialAsian PeopleChinaColorectal NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsAldehyde DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase, MitochondrialALDH2 protein, humanAldehyde dehydrogenasescolorectal cancerpolymorphismsusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID29026383
PMCPMC5636235
OpenAlexW2619298653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.