Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29026291›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2017

Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire in Iranian older adults.

Nahid Rejeh, Majideh Heravi-Karimooi, Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Pauline Griffiths, Maryam Nikkhah, Tahereh Bahrami

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of existing ageism scales.Ageing research reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nahid RejehElderly Care Research Centre, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Majideh Heravi-KarimooiElderly Care Research Centre, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba VaismoradiFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Pauline GriffithsCollege of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Maryam NikkhahFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Tahereh BahramiFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttitudes to the aging process are affected by the individual's sociocultural background. The measurement of this important concept among older people in various societies requires the use of tools that are able to demonstrate both reliability and validity.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to translate and validate the Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ) and investigate its psychometric features among Iranian older people.

methodsIn this methodological study, the Farsi version of the AAQ was validated among 400 Iranian older adults who were members of citizen clubs in an urban area of Iran. Content, face and construct (exploratory factor analysis) validities of the AAQ were assessed. In addition, its reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency and stability. For discriminant validity, the discriminant power of the AAQ in terms of gender and education levels was evaluated. Criterion validity showed a significant correlation between the most subscales of the AAQ and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis.

resultsThe exploratory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of the AAQ. The result of the test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was satisfactory and reported as

conclusionThe Farsi version of the AAQ showed favorable validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be used for assessing attitudes toward aging among older adults.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAgedAgingFemaleHumansIranMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingWorld Health OrganizationagingAttitudes to Aging Questionnaireelderlyolder adultspsychometrics propertiesreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID29026291
PMCPMC5626237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.