Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29026120›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Co-inoculum of Beauveria brongniartii and B. bassiana shows in vitro different metabolic behaviour in comparison to single inoculums.

L Canfora, N Abu-Samra, M Tartanus, B H Łabanowska, A Benedetti, F Pinzari, E Malusà

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Biocontrol ofInsects · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L CanforaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184, Rome, Italy.
N Abu-SamraCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-8460
M TartanusResearch Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1, 96-100, Skierniewice, Poland.
B H ŁabanowskaResearch Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1, 96-100, Skierniewice, Poland.
A BenedettiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184, Rome, Italy.
F PinzariCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184, Rome, Italy. flavia.pinzari@crea.gov.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-8734
E MalusàResearch Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1, 96-100, Skierniewice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-3379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of entomopathogenic fungi for biocontrol of plant pests is recently receiving an increased interest due to the need of reducing the impact of agricultural practices on the environment. Biocontrol efficacy could be improved by co-inoculation of different microorganisms. However, interactions between the fungal species can trigger or depress the biocontrol activity. Co-inoculation of two entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana and B. brongniartii) was performed in vitro to evaluate the effects of their joint behaviour on a range of different carbon sources in comparison to single inoculation. The two species showed a very different metabolic profile by Phenotype MicroArray

Indexed as

BeauveriaGenotypePest Control, BiologicalPhylogenyPlantsReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID29026120
PMCPMC5638874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.