Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29025999›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2018

Marijuana as a 'concept' flavour for cigar products: availability and price near California schools.

Lisa Henriksen, Nina C Schleicher, Kimberly Ababseh, Trent O Johnson, Stephen P Fortmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Twitter Surveillance at the Intersection of the Triangulum.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  9. Flavors and Implied Reduced-Risk Descriptors in Cigar Ads at Stores Near Schools.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  10. Neighborhood Disparities in the Availability, Advertising, Promotion, and Youth Appeal of Little Cigars and Cigarillos, United States, 2015.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa HenriksenStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Nina C SchleicherStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Kimberly AbabsehStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Trent O JohnsonStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stephen P FortmannKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

POLICY STUDIES ON LIMITING TOBACCO MARKETING TO YOUTHR01CA067850 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HENRIKSEN, LISA ANNE · 1997 to 2018
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the retail availability of cigar products that refer to marijuana and the largest package size of cigarillos available for ≤$1.

methodsTrained data collectors conducted marketing surveillance in a random sample of licensed tobacco retailers that sold little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs) (n=530) near a statewide sample of middle and high schools (n=132) in California. Multilevel models examined the presence of marijuana co-marketing and cigarillo pack size as a function of school/neighbourhood characteristics and adjusted for store type.

resultsOf stores that sold LCCs, approximately 62% contained at least one form of marijuana co-marketing: 53.2% sold cigar wraps marketed as blunt wraps, 27.2% sold cigarillos marketed as blunts and 26.0% sold at least one LCC with a marijuana-related 'concept' flavour. Controlling for store type, marijuana co-marketing was more prevalent in school neighbourhoods with a higher proportion of young residents (ages 5-17 years) and with lower median household income. Nearly all stores that sold LCCs (87.9%) offered the products for ≤$1. However, significantly larger packs at similarly low prices were available near schools in lower-income neighbourhoods and with a lower percentage of Hispanic students.

conclusionsUnderstanding how the tobacco industry manipulates cigar products and marketing to capitalise on the appeal of marijuana to youth and other priority populations is important to inform regulation, particularly for flavoured tobacco products. In addition, the retail availability of five and six packs of LCCs for ≤$1 near California schools underscores policy recommendations to establish minimum prices for multipacks.

Indexed as

Marijuana UseSchoolsTobacco ProductsAdolescentCaliforniaChildChild, PreschoolCommerceFemaleHumansMaleMarketingadvertising and promotiondisparitiesenvironmentnon-cigarette tobacco productspackaging and labelling

Identifiers

PMID29025999
PMCPMC5897220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.