Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29025737›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2017

Use of hospital-related health care among Health Links enrollees in the Central Ontario health region: a propensity-matched difference-in-differences study.

Luke Mondor, Kevin Walker, Yu Qing Bai, Walter P Wodchis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luke MondorAffiliations: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Mondor, Wodchis); Health System Performance Research Network (Mondor, Walker, Bai, Wodchis); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Walker, Bai, Wodchis), University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (Wodchis), Toronto, Ont.
Kevin WalkerAffiliations: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Mondor, Wodchis); Health System Performance Research Network (Mondor, Walker, Bai, Wodchis); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Walker, Bai, Wodchis), University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (Wodchis), Toronto, Ont.
Yu Qing BaiAffiliations: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Mondor, Wodchis); Health System Performance Research Network (Mondor, Walker, Bai, Wodchis); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Walker, Bai, Wodchis), University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (Wodchis), Toronto, Ont.
Walter P WodchisAffiliations: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Mondor, Wodchis); Health System Performance Research Network (Mondor, Walker, Bai, Wodchis); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Walker, Bai, Wodchis), University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (Wodchis), Toronto, Ont.
University of Toronto · CAResearch Network (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth Links are a new model of providing care coordination for high-cost, high-needs patients in Ontario. We evaluated use of hospital-related health care services among Health Links patients in the Central Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) of Ontario in the year before versus after program enrolment and compared rates of use with those among similar patients with complex needs not enrolled in the program (comparator group).

methodsWe identified all patients who received a Health Links coordinated care plan before Jan. 1, 2015, using linked registry and health administrative data. We used propensity scores to match (1:1) enrollees (registry) with comparator patients (administrative data). Using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized estimating equations, we evaluated 5 measures of Health Link performance: rates of hospital admission, emergency department visits, days in acute care, 30-day readmissions and 7-day postdischarge primary care follow-up.

resultsOf the 344 enrollees in the registry, we matched 313 [91.0%] to comparator patients. All measured sociodemographic, comorbidity and health care use characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups (all standardized differences < 0.10). For enrollees, the rate of days in acute care per person-year increased by 35% (incidence rate ratio 1.35 [confidence interval 1.11-1.65]) after versus before the index date, but differences were nonsignificant for all other measures. Difference-in-differences analyses revealed greater reductions in hospital admissions, emergency department visits and acute care days after the index date in the comparator group than among enrollees.

interpretationInitial implementation of the Health Link program in the Central LHIN did not reduce selected indicators of Health Link performance among enrollees. As the Health Link program evolves and standardization is implemented, future research may reveal effects from the initiative in other outcomes or with longer follow-up.

Identifiers

PMID29025737
PMCPMC5741420
OpenAlexW2761049301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.