Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29025722›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Advances in Screening, Imaging, and Management Trends.

P Nagpal, B A Policeni, G Bathla, A Khandelwal, C Derdeyn, D Skeete

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Best practice guidelines for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Are We Overscreening Low-Mechanism Trauma?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Endovascular Treatment for Head and Neck Trauma].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P NagpalFrom the Department of Radiology (P.N., B.A.P., G.B., C.D.).ORCID 0000-0003-2347-034X
B A PoliceniFrom the Department of Radiology (P.N., B.A.P., G.B., C.D.) bruno-policeni@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-3329
G BathlaFrom the Department of Radiology (P.N., B.A.P., G.B., C.D.).ORCID 0000-0003-3170-242X
A KhandelwalDepartment of Radiology (A.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2728-7799
C DerdeynFrom the Department of Radiology (P.N., B.A.P., G.B., C.D.).ORCID 0000-0002-5932-2683
D SkeeteTrauma Services (D.S.), Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-8139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blunt cerebrovascular injury is a relatively uncommon but sometimes life-threatening injury, particularly in patients presenting with ischemic symptoms in that vascular territory. The decision to pursue vascular imaging (generally CT angiography) is based on clinical and imaging findings. Several grading scales or screening criteria have been developed to guide the decision to pursue vascular imaging, as well as to recommend different treatment options for various injuries. The data supporting many of these guidelines and options are limited however. The purpose of this article is to review and compare these scales and criteria and the data supporting clinical efficacy and to make recommendations for future research in this area.

Identifiers

PMID29025722
PMCPMC7655313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.