Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29025107›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2017

Vanishing twin syndrome among ART singletons and pregnancy outcomes.

Maria C Magnus, Sara Ghaderi, Nils-Halvdan Morken, Per Magnus, Liv Bente Romundstad, Rolv Skjærven, Allen J Wilcox, Siri Eldevik Håberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Co-Occurrence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria C MagnusDivision for Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Sara GhaderiDivision for Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Nils-Halvdan MorkenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health (CeFH), Centre of Excellence at Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Liv Bente RomundstadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IVF Unit, St Olav's University Hospital, P.O. Box 3250 Sluppen, N- 7006 Trondheim, Norway.
Rolv SkjærvenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
Allen J WilcoxEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina NC 27709, USA.
Siri Eldevik HåbergCentre for Fertility and Health (CeFH), Centre of Excellence at Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONational Institutes of Health · USSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Epidemiologic Study Of Reproductive Outcomes And Environmental ExposuresZIAES044003 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WILCOX, ALLEN J · 2009 to 2020
$4.7M
Environmental And Genetic Causes Of Birth DefectsZIAES049027 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WILCOX, ALLEN J · 2009 to 2020
$2.6M
Medical Research Council MC/UU/12013/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/5Medical Research Council MR/M009351/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionAmong babies born by ART, do singleton survivors of a vanishing twin have lower birth weight than other singletons? SUMMARY ANSWER: Vanishing twin syndrome (VTS) was associated with lower birth weight among ART singletons; a sibship analysis indicated that the association was not confounded by maternal characteristics that remain stable between deliveries. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies indicate that ART singletons with VTS have increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, compared with other ART singletons. The potential contribution of unmeasured maternal background characteristics has been unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: This was a Norwegian population-based registry study, including 17 368 mothers with 20 410 ART singleton deliveries between January 1984 and December 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsThe study population included 17 291 ART singletons without VTS, 638 ART singletons with VTS and 2418 ART singletons with uncertain vanishing twin status. We estimated differences in birth weight and gestational age comparing ART singletons with VTS first to all ART singletons without VTS, and subsequently to their ART siblings without VTS, using random- and fixed-effects linear regression, respectively. The corresponding comparisons for the associations with preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) were conducted using random-and fixed-effects logistic regression. The sibling analysis of preterm birth included 587 discordant siblings, while the sibling analysis of SGA included 674 discordant siblings. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: ART singletons with VTS had lower birth weight when compared to all ART singletons without VTS, with an adjusted mean difference (95% CI) of -116 g (-165, -67). When we compared ART singletons with VTS to their ART singletons sibling without VTS, the adjusted mean difference was -112 g (-209, -15). ART singletons with VTS also had increased risk of being born SGA, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) of 1.48 (1.07, 2.03) compared to all ART singletons without VTS, and 2.79 (1.12, 6.91) in the sibship analyses. ART singletons with VTS were also more likely to be born preterm, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: We did not have information on maternal socio-economic status, but this factor is accounted for in the sibship analyses. We also had no information on whether fresh or frozen embryos were replaced. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe reduction in birth weight and increased risk of SGA in ART singletons with VTS may suggest the presence of harmful intrauterine factors with long-term health impact. While vanishing twins are not routinely observed in naturally conceived pregnancies, loss of a twin is potentially a risk factor for the surviving foetus in any pregnancy. This could be further explored in large samples of naturally conceived pregnancies with the necessary information. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors of this study are supported in part by the UK Medical Research Council, US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Norwegian Research Council. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousPregnancy OutcomePregnancy, TwinReproductive Techniques, AssistedBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRisk FactorsARTbirth weightCentre for Fertility and Healthgestational ageNorwaysmall for gestational agevanishing twin syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29025107
PMCPMC5850786
OpenAlexW2751391449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.