Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29025064›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of epidemiology2017

Impact of adding hand-washing and water disinfection promotion to oral cholera vaccination on diarrhoea-associated hospitalization in Dhaka, Bangladesh: evidence from a cluster randomized control trial.

Nusrat Najnin, Karin Leder, Firdausi Qadri, Andrew Forbes, Leanne Unicomb, Peter J Winch, Pavani K Ram, Elli Leontsini, Fosiul A Nizame, Shaila Arman and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Hand-washing promotion for preventing diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nusrat NajninICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Karin LederDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Firdausi QadriICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Andrew ForbesDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Leanne UnicombICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Peter J WinchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pavani K RamDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Elli LeontsiniJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Fosiul A NizameICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shaila ArmanICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farzana BegumICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shwapon K BiswasICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
John D ClemensICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad AliJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alejandro CraviotoICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Stephen P LubyICDDR,B: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDJohns Hopkins University · USMonash University · AUDinajpur Medical College · BDPalo Alto Institute · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Information on the impact of hygiene interventions on severe outcomes is limited. As a pre-specified secondary outcome of a cluster-randomized controlled trial among >400 000 low-income residents in Dhaka, Bangladesh, we examined the impact of cholera vaccination plus a behaviour change intervention on diarrhoea-associated hospitalization. Methods: Ninety neighbourhood clusters were randomly allocated into three areas: cholera-vaccine-only; vaccine-plus-behaviour-change (promotion of hand-washing with soap plus drinking water chlorination); and control. Study follow-up continued for 2 years after intervention began. We calculated cluster-adjusted diarrhoea-associated hospitalization rates using data we collected from nearby hospitals, and 6-monthly census data of all trial households. Results: A total of 429 995 people contributed 500 700 person-years of data (average follow-up 1.13 years). Vaccine coverage was 58% at the start of analysis but continued to drop due to population migration. In the vaccine-plus-behaviour-change area, water plus soap was present at 45% of hand-washing stations; 4% of households had detectable chlorine in stored drinking water. Hospitalization rates were similar across the study areas [events/1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval (CI), cholera-vaccine-only: 9.4 (95% CI: 8.3-10.6); vaccine-plus-behaviour-change: 9.6 (95% CI: 8.3-11.1); control: 9.7 (95% CI: 8.3-11.6)]. Cholera cases accounted for 7% of total number of diarrhoea-associated hospitalizations. Conclusions: Neither cholera vaccination alone nor cholera vaccination combined with behaviour-change intervention efforts measurably reduced diarrhoea-associated hospitalization in this highly mobile population, during a time when cholera accounted for a small fraction of diarrhoea episodes. Affordable community-level interventions that prevent infection from multiple pathogens by reliably separating faeces from the environment, food and water, with minimal behavioural demands on impoverished communities, remain an important area for research.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesCluster AnalysisDiarrheaFamily CharacteristicsFecesFemaleHand DisinfectionHospitalizationHumansCholera Vaccinesdiarrhoeahand-washinghospitalizationVaccinewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID29025064
PMCPMC5837384
OpenAlexW2753685376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.