Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29025018›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2017

The association between waterpipe smoking and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Arash Etemadi, Abdullah Gandomkar, Neal D Freedman, Mohsen Moghadami, Mohammad Reza Fattahi, Hossein Poustchi, Farhad Islami, Paolo Boffetta, Sanford M Dawsey, Christian C Abnet and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Waterpipe smoking: the pressing need for risk communication.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arash EtemadiDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdullah GandomkarNon-Communicable Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Neal D FreedmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mohsen MoghadamiNon-Communicable Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Reza FattahiGastroenterohepatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hossein PoustchiLiver and Pancreaticobilliary Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farhad IslamiSurveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Paolo BoffettaThe Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Institute for Translational Epidemiology, New York, NY, USA.
Sanford M DawseyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christian C AbnetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Reza MalekzadehDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer StudiesZIACP000185 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ABNET, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2025
$25.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unlike cigarettes, there is little information about the association between other tobacco products and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: We used the baseline data from the Pars Cohort Study conducted in southern Iran. In 2012, 9264 local residents between 40 and 75 years old were enrolled, with detailed information about lifestyle, including duration and frequency of tobacco use. GERD was defined based on questions assessing heartburn and regurgitation in the past 12 months, frequency and severity. Associations were calculated by logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, cigarettes and body mass index. Results: In the study, 25.4% of the participants had severe GERD (interfering with participants' routines), 25.1% had frequent GERD (at least once a week) and 11.2% had both severe and frequent GERD, all more common among women (p < 0.001); 45.6% of women and 28.3% of men smoked waterpipes. Among people not using medications against reflux symptoms, there was an association between waterpipe smoking and severe [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.04-1.35], frequent (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02-1.32) and severe and frequent reflux (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.08-1.56). The associations increased with the duration of use, intensity and cumulative waterpipe-years, reaching an OR of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.12-1.86) for severe and frequent reflux in those who had smoked more than 48 waterpipe-years. There was effect modification by sex, and all the associations were only seen among women. Conclusion: The increasing trend in the association between cumulative waterpipe use and reflux disease among women is particularly important given the growing waterpipe tobacco epidemic in many populations.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansIranLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesesophageal adenocarcinomagastroesophageal reflux diseasetobaccowaterpipe

Identifiers

PMID29025018
PMCPMC5837680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.