Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29024995›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2019

The equity impact of community women's groups to reduce neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of four cluster randomized trials.

Tanja A J Houweling, Caspar W N Looman, Kishwar Azad, Sushmita Das, Carina King, Abdul Kuddus, Sonia Lewycka, Dharma S Manandhar, Neena Sah More, Joanna Morrison and 8 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tanja A J HouwelingDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caspar W N LoomanDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kishwar AzadPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sushmita DasSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), Shahunagar, Mumbai, India.
Carina KingInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Abdul KuddusPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sonia LewyckaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Dharma S ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), YB Bhawan, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Neena Sah MoreSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), Shahunagar, Mumbai, India.
Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Tambosi PhiriMaiMwana Project, Mchinji, Malawi.
Shibanand RathEkjut, Potka, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Mikey RosatoInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Aman SenMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), YB Bhawan, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prasanta TripathyEkjut, Potka, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Audrey ProstInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
David OsrinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 085417MA/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are substantial in many developing countries. Little is known about how to address this problem. Trials in Asia and Africa have shown strong impacts on neonatal mortality of a participatory learning and action intervention with women's groups. Whether this intervention also reduces mortality inequalities remains unknown. We describe the equity impact of this women's groups intervention on the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) across socioeconomic strata.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of all four participatory women's group interventions that were shown to be highly effective in cluster randomized trials in India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Malawi. We estimated intervention effects on NMR and health behaviours for lower and higher socioeconomic strata using random effects logistic regression analysis. Differences in effect between strata were tested.

resultsAnalysis of 69120 live births and 2505 neonatal deaths shows that the intervention strongly reduced the NMR in lower (50-63% reduction depending on the measure of socioeconomic position used) and higher (35-44%) socioeconomic strata. The intervention did not show evidence of 'elite-capture': among the most marginalized populations, the NMR in intervention areas was 63% lower [95% confidence interval (CI) 48-74%] than in control areas, compared with 35% (95% CI: 15-50%) lower among the less marginalized in the last trial year (P-value for difference between most/less marginalized: 0.009). The intervention strongly improved home care practices, with no systematic socioeconomic differences in effect.

conclusionsParticipatory women's groups with high population coverage benefit the survival chances of newborns from all socioeconomic strata, and perhaps especially those born into the most deprived households.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInfant MortalityPrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsWomenBangladeshCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMalawiNepalDeveloping countriesinequalitiesinfant mortalityintervention studiesobstetric

Identifiers

PMID29024995
PMCPMC6380297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.