Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29024463›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2018

IChem: A Versatile Toolkit for Detecting, Comparing, and Predicting Protein-Ligand Interactions.

Franck Da Silva, Jeremy Desaphy, Didier Rognan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of potential SARS-CoV-2 MJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. How Ligands Interact with the Kinase Hinge.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Estimating the Similarity between Protein Pockets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Franck Da SilvaLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR 7200 CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 74 route du Rhin, 67400, Illkirch, France.
Jeremy DesaphyLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR 7200 CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 74 route du Rhin, 67400, Illkirch, France.
Didier RognanLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR 7200 CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 74 route du Rhin, 67400, Illkirch, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0577-641X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-based ligand design requires an exact description of the topology of molecular entities under scrutiny. IChem is a software package that reflects the many contributions of our research group in this area over the last decade. It facilitates and automates many tasks (e.g., ligand/cofactor atom typing, identification of key water molecules) usually left to the modeler's choice. It therefore permits the detection of molecular interactions between two molecules in a very precise and flexible manner. Moreover, IChem enables the conversion of intricate three-dimensional (3D) molecular objects into simple representations (fingerprints, graphs) that facilitate knowledge acquisition at very high throughput. The toolkit is an ideal companion for setting up and performing many structure-based design computations.

Indexed as

SoftwareLigandsModels, MolecularProteinsLigandsProteinscavitydrug designfingerprintsinteractionsvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID29024463
PMCPMC5901026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.