Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29024419›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2018

A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix

Christian Bianchi, Shawn Cazzell, Dean Vayser, Alexander M Reyzelman, Hasan Dosluoglu, Gregory Tovmassian, EpiFix VLU Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06831760 (A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute vs. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06831760 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute vs. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr Naveen Narayan MS, MCh (Plastic Surgery)Ran2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsVenous Leg UlcersArmsSOC and Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute, SOC and Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Comparative Study of Placental Allografts with Distinct Layer Composition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. PURIONJournal of biomaterials applications · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Christian BianchiDepartment of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Shawn CazzellLimb Preservation Platform, Inc, Fresno, CA, USA.
Dean VayserILD Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alexander M ReyzelmanCenter for Clinical Research, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Hasan DosluogluVA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Gregory TovmassianCenter for Clinical Research, Inc. Sacramento Foot and Ankle Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
EpiFix VLU Study Group
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USHeritage Preservation · USInstitute for Learning and Development · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USUniversity Foot & Ankle Institute · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix) allograft as an adjunct to multilayer compression therapy for the treatment of non-healing full-thickness venous leg ulcers. We randomly assigned 109 subjects to receive EpiFix and multilayer compression (n = 52) or dressings and multilayer compression therapy alone (n = 57). Patients were recruited from 15 centres around the USA and were followed up for 16 weeks. The primary end point of the study was defined as time to complete ulcer healing. Participants receiving weekly application of EpiFix and compression were significantly more likely to experience complete wound healing than those receiving standard wound care and compression (60% versus 35% at 12 weeks, P = 0·0128, and 71% versus 44% at 16 weeks, P = 0·0065). A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the time-to-healing performance with or without EpiFix, showing a significantly improved time to healing using the allograft (log-rank P = 0·0110). Cox regression analysis showed that subjects treated with EpiFix had a significantly higher probability of complete healing within 12 weeks (HR: 2·26, 95% confidence interval 1·25-4·10, P = 0·01) versus without EpiFix. These results confirm the advantage of EpiFix allograft as an adjunct to multilayer compression therapy for the treatment of non-healing, full-thickness venous leg ulcers.

Indexed as

Compression BandagesAdultAgedAllograftsAmnionChorionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVaricose UlcerWound HealingAmniotic membrane allograftsChronic woundsDehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograftVenous leg ulcers

Identifiers

PMID29024419
PMCPMC7949978
OpenAlexW2761355671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.