Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29024340›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2017

Multiple marker abundance profiling: combining selected reaction monitoring and data-dependent acquisition for rapid estimation of organelle abundance in subcellular samples.

Cornelia M Hooper, Tim J Stevens, Anna Saukkonen, Ian R Castleden, Pragya Singh, Gregory W Mann, Bertrand Fabre, Jun Ito, Michael J Deery, Kathryn S Lilley and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mining for protein S-sulfenylation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Separating Golgi Proteins fromThe Plant cell · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proteomic Analysis of Plasmodesmata FromFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Cornelia M HooperARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Tim J StevensMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK.
Anna SaukkonenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Ian R CastledenARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Pragya SinghJoint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94702, USA.
Gregory W MannJoint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94702, USA.
Bertrand FabreDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Jun ItoJoint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94702, USA.
Michael J DeeryDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Kathryn S LilleyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.
Christopher J PetzoldJoint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94702, USA.
A Harvey MillarARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Joshua L HeazlewoodJoint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94702, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-3826
Harriet T ParsonsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-9123
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBThe University of Western Australia · AUMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring changes in protein or organelle abundance in the cell is an essential, but challenging aspect of cell biology. Frequently-used methods for determining organelle abundance typically rely on detection of a very few marker proteins, so are unsatisfactory. In silico estimates of protein abundances from publicly available protein spectra can provide useful standard abundance values but contain only data from tissue proteomes, and are not coupled to organelle localization data. A new protein abundance score, the normalized protein abundance scale (NPAS), expands on the number of scored proteins and the scoring accuracy of lower-abundance proteins in Arabidopsis. NPAS was combined with subcellular protein localization data, facilitating quantitative estimations of organelle abundance during routine experimental procedures. A suite of targeted proteomics markers for subcellular compartment markers was developed, enabling independent verification of in silico estimates for relative organelle abundance. Estimation of relative organelle abundance was found to be reproducible and consistent over a range of tissues and growth conditions. In silico abundance estimations and localization data have been combined into an online tool, multiple marker abundance profiling, available in the SUBA4 toolbox (http://suba.live).

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBiomarkersOrganellesProtein TransportArabidopsis ProteinsBiomarkersProteomeArabidopsisorganellesprotein abundanceselected reaction monitoringshotgun proteomicstissues

Identifiers

PMID29024340
PMCPMC5863471
OpenAlexW2763692025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.