ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
BeWith: A Between-Within method to discover relationships between cancer modules via integrated analysis of mutual exclusivity, co-occurrence and functional interactions.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variant-Specific Landscape of Mutual Exclusivity Among BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS Oncogenes Reveals Overlap With Functionally Antagonistic Mutant Pairs.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- OncoBERT: Context-Aware Modeling of Somatic Mutations for Precision Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Causal Pivot: A structural approach to genetic heterogeneity and variant discovery in complex diseases.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Mutation Patterns Predict Drug Sensitivity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Mutational landscape of cancer-driver genes across human cancers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Modeling and predicting cancer clonal evolution with reinforcement learning.Genome research · 2023Article
- Cancer driver mutations: predictions and reality.Trends in molecular medicine · 2023Review
- Identifying Cancer Driver Pathways Based on the Mouth Brooding Fish Algorithm.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A forward selection algorithm to identify mutually exclusive alterations in cancer studies.Journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Fast mutual exclusivity algorithm nominates potential synthetic lethal gene pairs through brute force matrix product computations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- A Network-Centric Framework for the Evaluation of Mutual Exclusivity Tests on Cancer Drivers.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- DriveWays: a method for identifying possibly overlapping driver pathways in cancer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Identifying Drug Sensitivity Subnetworks with NETPHIX.iScience · 2020Article
- Inferring tumor progression in large datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Personalized cancer therapy prioritization based on driver alteration co-occurrence patterns.Genome medicine · 2020Article
- Network-based approaches elucidate differences within APOBEC and clock-like signatures in breast cancer.Genome medicine · 2020Article
- An Effective Graph Clustering Method to Identify Cancer Driver Modules.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Protein ensembles link genotype to phenotype.PLoS computational biology · 2019Review
- Combinatorial Detection of Conserved Alteration Patterns for Identifying Cancer Subnetworks.GigaScience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of the mutational landscape of cancer, including mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence of mutations, has been instrumental in studying the disease. We hypothesized that exploring the interplay between co-occurrence, mutual exclusivity, and functional interactions between genes will further improve our understanding of the disease and help to uncover new relations between cancer driving genes and pathways. To this end, we designed a general framework, BeWith, for identifying modules with different combinations of mutation and interaction patterns. We focused on three different settings of the BeWith schema: (i) BeME-WithFun, in which the relations between modules are enriched with mutual exclusivity, while genes within each module are functionally related; (ii) BeME-WithCo, which combines mutual exclusivity between modules with co-occurrence within modules; and (iii) BeCo-WithMEFun, which ensures co-occurrence between modules, while the within module relations combine mutual exclusivity and functional interactions. We formulated the BeWith framework using Integer Linear Programming (ILP), enabling us to find optimally scoring sets of modules. Our results demonstrate the utility of BeWith in providing novel information about mutational patterns, driver genes, and pathways. In particular, BeME-WithFun helped identify functionally coherent modules that might be relevant for cancer progression. In addition to finding previously well-known drivers, the identified modules pointed to other novel findings such as the interaction between NCOR2 and NCOA3 in breast cancer. Additionally, an application of the BeME-WithCo setting revealed that gene groups differ with respect to their vulnerability to different mutagenic processes, and helped us to uncover pairs of genes with potentially synergistic effects, including a potential synergy between mutations in TP53 and the metastasis related DCC gene. Overall, BeWith not only helped us uncover relations between potential driver genes and pathways, but also provided additional insights on patterns of the mutational landscape, going beyond cancer driving mutations. Implementation is available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Przytycka/software/bewith.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.