Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29023486›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

The sea cucumber genome provides insights into morphological evolution and visceral regeneration.

Xiaojun Zhang, Lina Sun, Jianbo Yuan, Yamin Sun, Yi Gao, Libin Zhang, Shihao Li, Hui Dai, Jean-François Hamel, Chengzhang Liu and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 275 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sea CucumberResearch square · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. LncRNA-miRNA interplay regulate intestinal regeneration in the sea cucumberComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaojun ZhangKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Lina SunKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Jianbo YuanKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Yamin SunTianjin Biochip Corporation, Tianjin, China.
Yi GaoKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Libin ZhangKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Shihao LiKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Hui DaiTianjin Biochip Corporation, Tianjin, China.
Jean-François HamelSociety for the Exploration and Valuing of the Environment (SEVE), Portugal Cove-St. Philips, Newfoundland, Canada.
Chengzhang LiuKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Yang YuKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Shilin LiuKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Wenchao LinTianjin Biochip Corporation, Tianjin, China.
Kaimin GuoTianjin Biochip Corporation, Tianjin, China.
Songjun JinKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Peng XuCollege of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Kenneth B StoreyDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pin HuanKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Tao ZhangKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Yi ZhouKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Jiquan ZhangKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Chenggang LinKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoni LiKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Lili XingKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Da HuoKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Mingzhe SunKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Lei WangCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Annie MercierDepartment of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Fuhua LiKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Hongsheng YangKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Jianhai XiangKey Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology & Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-7787
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNCarleton University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CANankai University · CNXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apart from sharing common ancestry with chordates, sea cucumbers exhibit a unique morphology and exceptional regenerative capacity. Here we present the complete genome sequence of an economically important sea cucumber, A. japonicus, generated using Illumina and PacBio platforms, to achieve an assembly of approximately 805 Mb (contig N50 of 190 Kb and scaffold N50 of 486 Kb), with 30,350 protein-coding genes and high continuity. We used this resource to explore key genetic mechanisms behind the unique biological characters of sea cucumbers. Phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses revealed the presence of marker genes associated with notochord and gill slits, suggesting that these chordate features were present in ancestral echinoderms. The unique shape and weak mineralization of the sea cucumber adult body were also preliminarily explained by the contraction of biomineralization genes. Genome, transcriptome, and proteome analyses of organ regrowth after induced evisceration provided insight into the molecular underpinnings of visceral regeneration, including a specific tandem-duplicated prostatic secretory protein of 94 amino acids (PSP94)-like gene family and a significantly expanded fibrinogen-related protein (FREP) gene family. This high-quality genome resource will provide a useful framework for future research into biological processes and evolution in deuterostomes, including remarkable regenerative abilities that could have medical applications. Moreover, the multiomics data will be of prime value for commercial sea cucumber breeding programs.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeAnimalsBone and BonesCalcification, PhysiologicConserved SequenceGenes, HomeoboxMultigene FamilyNervous SystemPhylogenyRegenerationSea CucumbersViscera

Identifiers

PMID29023486
PMCPMC5638244
OpenAlexW2761961135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.