Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29023464›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Role of p16 testing in cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women.

Christine J McGrath, Rochelle Garcia, Trong T Trinh, Barbra A Richardson, Grace C John-Stewart, Evans Nyongesa-Malava, Nelly R Mugo, Emily H Glynn, Samah R Sakr, Hugo De Vuyst and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary HPV and Molecular Cervical Cancer Screening in US Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine J McGrathDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-0350
Rochelle GarciaDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Trong T TrinhDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America.
Barbra A RichardsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America.
Grace C John-StewartDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America.
Evans Nyongesa-MalavaKenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nelly R MugoKenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emily H GlynnDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Samah R SakrCoptic Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hugo De VuystInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Michael H ChungDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America.
University of Washington · USKenyatta National Hospital · KECentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRNairobi Hospital · KE

Funding

Pediatric HIV-1 in Africa: Pathogenesis and ManagementK24HD054314 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN-STEWART, GRACE C. · 2006 to 2016
$1.2M
HAART Adherence Interventions in Africa: an RCTK23AI065222 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHUNG, MICHAEL HOONBAE · 2005 to 2009
$639k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI065222NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD054314World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundp16 immunohistochemistry is used to evaluate for HPV-associated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The diagnostic performance of p16 in HIV infection is unclear.

methodsBetween June-December 2009, HIV-infected women underwent Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and colposcopy-directed biopsy as the disease gold standard at a HIV clinic in Kenya. Pap smears were evaluated for p16 expression. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of p16 to detect CIN2/3 on histology and the impact of immunosuppression and ART was assessed.

resultsOf 331 cervical samples with p16 expression, p16 sensitivity and specificity to detect CIN2/3 was 54.1% and 72.4% respectively, which was lower than Pap and HPV in sensitivity, but higher in specificity than Pap, HPV, and VIA. Combining tests and p16 reduced sensitivity and increased specificity of Pap from 90.5% to 48.7% and 51.4% to 81.7%; of VIA from 59.5% to 37.8% and 67.6% to 89.9%; and of HPV from 82.4% to 50.0% and 55.3% to 84.8%. Combination p16 increased the PPV of Pap from 34.9% to 43.4%; of HPV from 34.7% to 48.7%; and VIA from 34.9% to 51.9%. Adjunctive p16 did not change AUC (P>0.05). P16 performance was not altered by immunosuppression or ART use. Combining p16 with HPV and VIA reduced the variation in HPV and VIA performance associated with CD4 and ART.

conclusionAs an adjunctive test in HIV-infected women, p16 immunohistochemistry increased specificity and PPV of HPV and VIA for CIN2/3, and was not altered in performance by immunosuppression, ART, or age.

Indexed as

HIV-1AdolescentAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV ProteaseHumansImmunohistochemistryKenyaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestUterine Cervical NeoplasmsHIV Proteasep16 protease, Human immunodeficiency virus 1

Identifiers

PMID29023464
PMCPMC5638250
OpenAlexW2761615648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.