Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29023420›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Probiotics for the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Outpatients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sara Blaabjerg, Daniel Maribo Artzi, Rune Aabenhus

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03619746 (The Utility of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Educational Initiative in Decreasing Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in Children With Local Reactions From Insect Bites), which is not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03619746 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Utility of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Educational Initiative in Decreasing Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in Children With Local Reactions From Insect Bites

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York City Health and Hospitals CorporationRan2018 to 2020Enrolled71ConditionsCellulitis, Insect Bites, Insect StingsArmsPOCUS Educational Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Gut Microbiome Recovery inDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gut microbes · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. The role ofFood science and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara BlaabjergThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark. wck913@alumni.ku.dk.
Daniel Maribo ArtziThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark. fsm593@alumni.ku.dk.
Rune AabenhusThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark. runeaa@sund.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common adverse effect of antibiotic use is diarrhea. Probiotics are living microorganisms, which, upon oral ingestion, may prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) by the normalization of an unbalanced gastrointestinal flora. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of probiotics used for the prevention of AAD in an outpatient setting. A search of the PubMed database was conducted and yielded a total of 17 RCTs with 3631 participants to be included in the review. A meta-analysis was conducted for the primary outcome: the incidence of AAD. The pooled results found that AAD was present in 8.0% of the probiotic group compared to 17.7% in the control group (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66; I² = 58%), and the species-specific results were similar regarding the probiotic strains

Indexed as

antibiotic-associated diarrheaBifidobacteriumLactobacillusprimary careprobioticsSaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID29023420
PMCPMC5745464
OpenAlexW2762238784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.