ReviewJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2017
Recommendations for a Clinical Decision Support System for Work-Related Asthma in Primary Care Settings.
Review in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Decision Support for Worker Health: A Five-Site Qualitative Needs Assessment in Primary Care Settings.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Opportunities at the intersection of work and health: Developing the occupational data for health information model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Update on the Management of Occupational Asthma and Work-Exacerbated Asthma.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2019Review
- Enhancing Worker Health Through Clinical Decision Support (CDS): An Introduction to a Compilation.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe a recommended clinical decision support (CDS) approach for work-related asthma for incorporation in electronic health records (EHRs) for primary care health care providers.
methodsSubject matter experts convened by the American Thoracic Society reviewed available guidelines and published literature to develop specific recommendations.
resultsIt is important to recognize possible work-related asthma among persons with new-onset or worsening asthma. The work group recommends incorporating three simple questions about temporal relations between asthma symptoms and work in EHR systems and identified specific clinical conditions to trigger this intervention. Patients with positive responses to the three questions should have the asthma diagnosis documented and have further evaluation, education, and possible referral.
conclusionAn effective CDS system for improving recognition of work-related asthma may help reduce morbidity and mortality of asthma in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.