ArticleThe international journal of biostatistics2017
A Generally Efficient Targeted Minimum Loss Based Estimator based on the Highly Adaptive Lasso.
Article in The international journal of biostatistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal Effect Estimation With TMLE: Handling Missing Data and Near Violations of Positivity.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2026Article
- Powering RCTs for Marginal Effects With GLMs Using Prognostic Score Adjustment.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Estimating average causal effects with incomplete exposure and confounders.Journal of causal inference · 2026Article
- A causal framework for evaluating drivers of policy effect heterogeneity using difference-in-differences.Health services & outcomes research methodology · 2026Article
- HAL-Based Plug-in Estimation with Pointwise Asymptotic Normality of the Causal Dose-response Curve.Journal of causal inference · 2026Article
- Replicated blood-based biomarkers for myalgic encephalomyelitis not explicable by inactivity.EMBO molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Identification and Estimation of the Average Causal Effects Under Dietary Substitution Strategies.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Commentary on ``Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are'': Statistical considerations for generating reliable evidence across a spectrum of studies that increasingly involve real-world elements.Observational studies · 2025Article
- Targeted learning with an undersmoothed LASSO propensity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health-care database studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- HIGHLY ADAPTIVE LASSO: MACHINE LEARNING THAT PROVIDES VALID NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE IN REALISTIC MODELS.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- EFFICIENT AND MULTIPLY ROBUST RISK ESTIMATION UNDER GENERAL FORMS OF DATASET SHIFT.Annals of statistics · 2024Article
- Kernel Debiased Plug-in Estimation: Simultaneous, Automated Debiasing without Influence Functions for Many Target Parameters.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024Article
- Efficient and flexible estimation of natural direct and indirect effects under intermediate confounding and monotonicity constraints.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Efficiently transporting causal direct and indirect effects to new populations under intermediate confounding and with multiple mediators.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2022Article
- Individualized treatment rules under stochastic treatment cost constraints.Journal of causal inference · 2022Article
- Efficient nonparametric inference on the effects of stochastic interventions under two-phase sampling, with applications to vaccine efficacy trials.Biometrics · 2021Article
- Universal sieve-based strategies for efficient estimation using machine learning tools.Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability · 2021Article
- Methodological considerations when analysing and interpreting real-world data.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Improved small-sample estimation of nonlinear cross-validated prediction metrics.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Suppose we observe n $n$ independent and identically distributed observations of a finite dimensional bounded random variable. This article is concerned with the construction of an efficient targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) of a pathwise differentiable target parameter of the data distribution based on a realistic statistical model. The only smoothness condition we will enforce on the statistical model is that the nuisance parameters of the data distribution that are needed to evaluate the canonical gradient of the pathwise derivative of the target parameter are multivariate real valued cadlag functions (right-continuous and left-hand limits, (G. Neuhaus. On weak convergence of stochastic processes with multidimensional time parameter. Ann Stat 1971;42:1285-1295.) and have a finite supremum and (sectional) variation norm. Each nuisance parameter is defined as a minimizer of the expectation of a loss function over over all functions it its parameter space. For each nuisance parameter, we propose a new minimum loss based estimator that minimizes the loss-specific empirical risk over the functions in its parameter space under the additional constraint that the variation norm of the function is bounded by a set constant. The constant is selected with cross-validation. We show such an MLE can be represented as the minimizer of the empirical risk over linear combinations of indicator basis functions under the constraint that the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients is bounded by the constant: i.e., the variation norm corresponds with this L1 $L_1$-norm of the vector of coefficients. We will refer to this estimator as the highly adaptive Lasso (HAL)-estimator. We prove that for all models the HAL-estimator converges to the true nuisance parameter value at a rate that is faster than n-1/4 $n^{-1/4}$ w.r.t. square-root of the loss-based dissimilarity. We also show that if this HAL-estimator is included in the library of an ensemble super-learner, then the super-learner will at minimal achieve the rate of convergence of the HAL, but, by previous results, it will actually be asymptotically equivalent with the oracle (i.e., in some sense best) estimator in the library. Subsequently, we establish that a one-step TMLE using such a super-learner as initial estimator for each of the nuisance parameters is asymptotically efficient at any data generating distribution in the model, under weak structural conditions on the target parameter mapping and model and a strong positivity assumption (e.g., the canonical gradient is uniformly bounded). We demonstrate our general theorem by constructing such a one-step TMLE of the average causal effect in a nonparametric model, and establishing that it is asymptotically efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.