Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022915›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2017

Wild-type and mutant p53 differentially modulate miR-124/iASPP feedback following pohotodynamic therapy in human colon cancer cell line.

Kuijie Liu, Weidong Chen, Sanlin Lei, Li Xiong, Hua Zhao, Dong Liang, Zhendong Lei, Nanjiang Zhou, Hongliang Yao, Ying Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Peptide Fractions Extracted from the Hemolymph ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. iASPP suppresses Gp78-mediated TMCO1 degradation to maintain CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kuijie LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Weidong ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Sanlin LeiDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Li XiongDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Hua ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Dong LiangThe People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Provincial People's Hospital), Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Zhendong LeiDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Nanjiang ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Hongliang YaoDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Ying LiangDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China.
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNCentral South University · CNCentral South University of Forestry and Technology · CNHenan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a most common digestive system malignant tumor. p53 mutation has essential role in cancers and is frequently observed in CRC and presents a huge challenge. p53 mutation has been reported to attenuate the inhibitory effect of photofrin-based photodynamic therapy (PDT). p53 mutation-induced gain of function brings up the dysfunction of carcinogenic factors, including miRNAs. Our research found that PDT suppressed CRC cell viability, reduced the tumor size and prolonged the survival time, all of which could be attenuated by p53 mutation or deletion. After p53 mutation or deletion, several miRNA expression levels were downregulated, among which miR-124 was the most strongly downregulated, whereas iASPP expression was upregulated. p53 binds to the promoter of miR-124 to promote its expression and then inhibited iASPP expression, so as to amplify the inhibitory effect of PDT on wild-type p53 cells. In p53-mutant or -deleted cells, this binding no longer worked to promote miR-124 expression, and iASPP expression increased, finally resulted in promoted CRC cell viability upon PDT. The interactive modulation among miR and iASPP in p53-mutant or -deleted cells may serve as a crucial pathway, which mediates therapy resistance when p53 is mutated or deleted, in the process of PDT treatment of CRC.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalColorectal NeoplasmsDihematoporphyrin EtherDNA-Binding ProteinsHCT116 CellsHT29 CellsHumansMiceMicroRNAsNeoplasm TransplantationPhotochemotherapyAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsDihematoporphyrin EtherDNA-Binding ProteinsMicroRNAsMIRN124 microRNA, humanPPP1R13B protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID29022915
PMCPMC5682646
OpenAlexW2762218062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.