Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022843›Full record

ReviewInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2018

Should we treat aneurysms in perforator arteries from the basilar trunk? Review of 49 cases published in the literature and presentation of three personal cases.

Yves Chau, Marina Sachet, Jacques Sédat

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 7T magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of basilar artery perforator aneurysms - initial experience of a non-invasive alternative to DSA.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stent-assisted coiling of a ruptured basilar artery perforator aneurysm: A case report.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A giant basilar artery perforator aneurysm.Radiology case reports · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yves ChauUnité de Neuro-interverventionnelle, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-5326
Marina SachetUnité de Neuro-interverventionnelle, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, France.
Jacques SédatUnité de Neuro-interverventionnelle, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-1457
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basilar trunk perforator artery aneurysms are rare. Their diagnosis and treatment are difficult, controversial, and challenging. Analysis of 52 cases (49 documented in the literature and three personal cases) clearly shows a re-bleeding rate of 15% in patients whose aneurysm has not been occluded and 0% in treated patients ( p < 0.05). The most effective treatment, and the one that presents the least complication, is double-stenting across the basilar trunk.

Indexed as

StentsAgedCerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcomebasilar trunkPerforator aneurysmstent

Identifiers

PMID29022843
PMCPMC5772538
OpenAlexW2761256305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.