Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022790›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2018

Accelerated discharge within 72 hours of colorectal cancer resection using simple discharge criteria.

A Emmanuel, E Chohda, C Botfield, J Ellul

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04461275 (ERAS 2.0 - Accelerated 23-hour ERAS Care for Colorectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04461275 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

ERAS 2.0 - Accelerated 23-hour ERAS Care for Colorectal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorZuyderland Medisch CentrumRan2020 to 2021Enrolled41ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryArmsERAS 2.0
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A EmmanuelKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , UK.
E ChohdaKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , UK.
C BotfieldKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , UK.
J EllulKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Short hospital stays and accelerated discharge within 72 hours following colorectal cancer resections have not been widely achieved. Series reporting on accelerated discharge involve heterogeneous patient populations and exclude important groups. Strict adherence to some discharge requirements may lead to delays in discharge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of accelerated discharge within 72 hours of all elective colorectal cancer resections using simple discharge criteria. Methods Elective colorectal cancer resections performed between August 2009 and December 2015 by a single surgeon were reviewed. Perioperative care was based on an enhanced recovery programme. A set of simplified discharge criteria were used. Outcomes including postoperative complications, readmissions and reoperations were compared between patients discharged within 72 hours and those with a longer postoperative stay. Results Overall, 256 colorectal cancer resections (90% laparoscopic) were performed. The mean patient age was 70.8 years. The median length of stay was 3 days. Fifty-eight per cent of all patients and sixty-three per cent of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were discharged within 72 hours. Accelerated discharge was not associated with adverse outcomes compared with delayed discharge. Patients discharged within 72 hours had significantly fewer postoperative complications, readmissions and reoperations. Open surgery and stoma formation were associated with discharge after 72 hours but not age, co-morbidities, neoadjuvant chemoradiation or surgical procedure. Conclusions Accelerated discharge within 72 hours of elective colorectal resection for cancer is safely achievable for the majority of patients without compromising short-term outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMalePatient DischargePatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAccelerated dischargeColorectal cancerColorectal surgeryLength of stay

Identifiers

PMID29022790
PMCPMC5838672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.