Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022295›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2017

Retinopathy of Prematurity-assist: Novel Software for Detecting Plus Disease.

Elias Khalili Pour, Hamidreza Pourreza, Kambiz Ameli Zamani, Alireza Mahmoudi, Arash Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Mahla Shadravan, Reza Karkhaneh, Ramak Rouhi Pour, Mohammad Riazi Esfahani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smartphone-based fundus photography for screening of plus-disease retinopathy of prematurity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elias Khalili PourDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamidreza PourrezaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Kambiz Ameli ZamaniDepartment of Pediatric Opthalmology, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza MahmoudiDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash Mir Mohammad SadeghiDepartment of Pediatric Opthalmology, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahla ShadravanDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza KarkhanehDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramak Rouhi PourDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Riazi EsfahaniDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. riazifahimi@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo design software with a novel algorithm, which analyzes the tortuosity and vascular dilatation in fundal images of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) patients with an acceptable accuracy for detecting plus disease.

methodsEighty-seven well-focused fundal images taken with RetCam were classified to three groups of plus, non-plus, and pre-plus by agreement between three ROP experts. Automated algorithms in this study were designed based on two methods: the curvature measure and distance transform for assessment of tortuosity and vascular dilatation, respectively as two major parameters of plus disease detection.

resultsThirty-eight plus, 12 pre-plus, and 37 non-plus images, which were classified by three experts, were tested by an automated algorithm and software evaluated the correct grouping of images in comparison to expert voting with three different classifiers, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine and multilayer perceptron network. The plus, pre-plus, and non-plus images were analyzed with 72.3%, 83.7%, and 84.4% accuracy, respectively.

conclusionsThe new automated algorithm used in this pilot scheme for diagnosis and screening of patients with plus ROP has acceptable accuracy. With more improvements, it may become particularly useful, especially in centers without a skilled person in the ROP field.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsInfant, PrematureSoftwareHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInfant, NewbornPhotographyPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsRetinal VesselsRetinopathy of PrematurityTelemedicineRetinal vessels abnormalitiesRetinopathy of prematurityTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29022295
PMCPMC5726987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.