Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022189›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2017

Knowledge, perceptions, and practice of ecopharmacovigilance among pharmacy professionals in China.

Juan Liu, Jun Wang, Xian-Min Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Environmental pollution with psychiatric drugs.World journal of psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China. wangj79@hotmail.com.
Xian-Min HuDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecopharmacovigilance (EPV) is now a well-accepted critical component for the control of potential environmental risk posed by pharmaceutical residues. And improving the knowledge and perceptions about EPV, especially among pharmacy professionals, is the first step towards addressing the environmental impact of pharmaceuticals. This cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and practice on EPV using a validated self-administered questionnaire delivered to a sample of 120 pharmacy professionals in Hubei Province, China. And 107 usable survey instruments were acquired. The mean score for knowledge about EPV was 3.85 out of a total of 10. The pharmacy professionals' overall perceptions of EPV and pharmaceutical pollution in environment were positive. But of the 107 respondents, 45 (42%) stated that they had not participated in any EPV measure. In addition, none had received training on EPV, and only 25 (23%) respondents had read the literature on EPV. In response to the question about the major perceived barrier to the effective implementation of EPV in China, 45 (42%) respondents chose the answer "poor awareness of EPV." These data suggests most pharmacy professionals in China had a positive attitude but lack of knowledge and practices towards EPV. Therefore, more should be done to enhance pharmacy professionals' knowledge on EPV.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacovigilanceProfessional RoleAttitude of Health PersonnelChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansMalePharmaciesSurveys and QuestionnairesEcopharmacovigilanceEnvironmentKnowledgePerceptionPharmaceuticalsPharmacy professionals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.